Discuss Back to the Future

Right at the start. You see Burger King stuff on the table, then the radio comes on talking about Toyotas. Then when Marty leaves a Burger King is right next door. On his way to school the guy in the jeep pulling him on the skateboard is wearing a Mountain Dew hat (Pepsi product and Pepsi is in other places in the series). 9 minutes in they show you the cool new Toyota truck he says is so hot. I really liked those Toyota trucks, and Pepsi is my cola of choice (7up for clear though) so I'm not hating because I don't like that stuff.. The product placement is just so in your face and I didn't notice it so much when I was young.

9 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

'You wanna Pepsi, son, you gotta pay for it.'

Gimme a pack of Red Apples any day....

California Raisins got a refund for having their product associated with the bum on the bench and Miller had an arrangement where they didn't pay to have their trucks in the movie, but supplied beer to the cast and crew.

AWW THE 80S..THE BIRTH OF BLATANT PRODUCT PLACEMENTS...

@VHS-VANDAL said:

AWW THE 80S..THE BIRTH OF BLATANT PRODUCT PLACEMENTS...

Hardly. You forget that every TV used to be named after the sponsor and the actors would do ads In character during the broadcast.

THAT WAS HONESTY...THE 80S IS WHEN PRODUCTS BEGAN BEING PLACED IN SHOTS AND NOT MENTIONED.THE ERA OF SNEAKY ADVERTISING.

No, the kind of product placement you describe also predates the 80s, there was product placement in the 60s and 70s, basically any tine you see characters mention or use a real product, it is an intentional product placement.

Product placement like what we see in BTTF really took off after E.T. ate Reese's Pieces and sales went thru the roof. Before that Hollywood usually had to get permission/pay to use a product in a film or tv show. Now it's the other way around, companies pay Hollywood.

@Marcintosh said:

Product placement like what we see in BTTF really took off after E.T. ate Reese's Pieces and sales went thru the roof. Before that Hollywood usually had to get permission/pay to use a product in a film or tv show. Now it's the other way around, companies pay Hollywood.

I always thought Ghostbusters would've hilarious if they had gotten the rights to the real Pillsbury Doughboy. (How sacrilegious would that be!) I don't think they even bothered trying, back then it was such a bizarre concept--and expensive--to have a real product featured so heavily.

Like you said, since the late 80s, product placement has been a normal part of filmmaking & profits. Nowadays it would be bizarre for a movie to invent a fictional brand as prominently as they did with Stay-Puft.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login