讨论 时光穿梭
讨论 → 电影 → 时光穿梭 → 一般问题
How has this escaped more acclaim and attention?
BenedictSTAFFMOD 发布于 2019 年 10 月 06 日 1:45上午
Seriously, I was hugely impressed with this. Smart, low key, well delivered and acted. It's so much better than 90% of other sci fi films which try to do too much or have a big enough budget to indulge themselves. This deserves way more viewers. I looked up the director and co-writer and neither of them seem to have done anything since, which, unless they're operating under different names now, is a travesty.
MongoLloyd 的回复
于 2019 年 10 月 06 日 11:56上午
Low budget indies only garner attention when they're based on topical subject matter or have A-listers in the cast. I've seen a slew of similar films that nobody has ever heard of and never will. I thought this was a little odd, but I always appreciate a new take on sci-fi material.
Midi-chlorian_Count 的回复
于 2019 年 10 月 07 日 11:37上午
A bit disappointed in this thread as it sparked a re-interest in watching / finishing this:- ARQ
Pretty terrible. I gave it 1.5 stars. Time Lapse was miles better (3.5 stars), even though on the face of it they seem quite similar in terms of budget / plot contrivance...
Benedict 的回复
于 2019 年 10 月 07 日 8:56下午
I really enjoyed ARQ! In fact, at the time I wrote: "happily surprising and unique time travel sci-fi thriller. So much better than reviews or its reputation would imply. Highly recommended." Sorry to hear you didn't like it.