It's a mini-series, which touches on a similar idea, but they flesh the philosophical/theoretical part more and take a different angle on determinism... It's worth checking out, although it doesn't have the charm of this movie, very different mood.
Yes, I've seen all of Devs. From what I understood, they developed a computer that could somehow "play back" historical events as if playing back an audio/video recording - which also doesn't make sense if nothing was ever extant to record said events in the first place. I suppose if one could tap into the space/time continuum and detect vibrations in a specific area at a certain date and time, maybe activity there could be replicated.
The way I understood the idea, was that they'd be able to calculate what would have been necessary in the past, for things to be how they are in the present... And with this calculation, they would be able to forecast into the future, but the farther they get, the fuzzier it is.
In Source Code, it seems like a similar simulation that they're running based on his last memories... So they're running multiple scenarios based on these memories to figure out what actually happened...
It's interesting how different and similar this film and that show are. I think Source Code has a more lasting effect on viewers...
Reply by CheekyMonkey
on March 15, 2021 at 12:54 PM
Have you seen Devs?
It's a mini-series, which touches on a similar idea, but they flesh the philosophical/theoretical part more and take a different angle on determinism... It's worth checking out, although it doesn't have the charm of this movie, very different mood.
Reply by MongoLloyd
on March 15, 2021 at 1:27 PM
Yes, I've seen all of Devs. From what I understood, they developed a computer that could somehow "play back" historical events as if playing back an audio/video recording - which also doesn't make sense if nothing was ever extant to record said events in the first place. I suppose if one could tap into the space/time continuum and detect vibrations in a specific area at a certain date and time, maybe activity there could be replicated.
Reply by CheekyMonkey
on March 15, 2021 at 1:36 PM
The way I understood the idea, was that they'd be able to calculate what would have been necessary in the past, for things to be how they are in the present... And with this calculation, they would be able to forecast into the future, but the farther they get, the fuzzier it is.
In Source Code, it seems like a similar simulation that they're running based on his last memories... So they're running multiple scenarios based on these memories to figure out what actually happened...
It's interesting how different and similar this film and that show are. I think Source Code has a more lasting effect on viewers...
Reply by MongoLloyd
on March 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM
But they were not predicting the future, they were viewing events that happened in the distant past.
Reply by CheekyMonkey
on March 16, 2021 at 5:21 PM
I think in Devs they were trying to do both... In Source Code they were only concerned with the few minutes before the main guy's death.
Reply by MongoLloyd
on March 17, 2021 at 1:17 AM
I was talking about Devs. Source Code seems a lot more straightforward to me (until the ending, haha).
Reply by CheekyMonkey
on March 17, 2021 at 3:22 AM
Yes, devs is more complicated because they use the "multiverse" hypothesis. It gets messy... haha
Reply by MongoLloyd
on March 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM
One would have to assume multiverse was also involved with Source Code.
Reply by CheekyMonkey
on March 17, 2021 at 11:33 AM
True, but I guess because it's a short period of time (minutes), it doesn't get a messy
Reply by MongoLloyd
on March 17, 2021 at 12:55 PM
I'm referring to the ending, which was a different reality based on Stevens actions.
Reply by CheekyMonkey
on March 17, 2021 at 1:23 PM
Underrated movie. Your comments make me want to watch it again.